Muncie City

Muncie State of the City Address

Posted on

“Mayor Dan said what?  We’re interested, tell us more!”

agriculture cows curious pasture
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com


If you missed the City of Muncie Mayor Dan Ridenour’s state of the city address, you can watch it on Facebook.  It’s very interesting.

Muncie State of the City

Larry Riley – Animal Control

Posted on

For all the readers of Muncie Politics without a Facebook account, Riley tries to make some sense of the finances of the animal shelter. This city is one big financial mess.

Larry Riley

February 18 at 7:11 PM · 

Following my last FB posting about the nearly $800,000 costs of animal control services in Muncie (and Delaware County), a couple readers responded with questions or answers about where do the revenues received for dog adoptions or surrenders or reclamations go.
* * * * *
One person said 80 percent of these revenues go to the city’s General Fund and 20 percent stay in the animal shelter account. That may well be what’s supposed to happen. I don’t recall this breakdown. I did look at the actual figures from the most recent Muncie documents reported to the Indiana Department of Local Government Finance, which is from 2018. (I presume city officials, who inherited a financial mess, if not *disaster*, remain working on the 2019 report.) Some of the amounts are eye-opening.
* * * * *
Several accounts are in play. Among the General Fund receipts are included $6,489 in “other charges” listed as “animal shelter-reclaims” (as in owners reclaimed their animals and paid costs, I presume). Into another fund went a whopping $28 in charges for “animal shelter adoptions fees.” Yes, just $28.
* * * * *
Another $150,000 went into the General Fund for the interlocal agreement with Delaware County, money the county pays for animal services provided by the city’s shelter (for which city residents pay county taxes as well as their own taxes for the city animal shelter). I see no money coming from Yorktown, Daleville, or any other local government.
* * * * *
The animal shelter’s “non-reverting fund”—meaning at the end of the year, any money left over does NOT revert to the General Fund, but stays with the animal shelter—receipted $3,556 in “animal shelter fees.” Not sure what that means. Another account NOT in the General Fund, titled “Animal Shelter Adoption Fees,” shows $8,128 receipted in. I don’t know whether that lonely 28 adoption fee bucks listed in the General Fund plus the $8,128 in the “adoption fees” account are the total or not. If so, the breakdown for adoptions is more like 1 percent to the General Fund and 99 percent to the shelter. Maybe a reader has a better idea.
* * * * *
I have to suspect the $3,556 in the non-reverting fund also includes adoption revenues, which would make the adoption breakdown exactly 70 percent to the General Fund, and 30 percent exactly to the animal shelter.
* * * * *
The report also shows the animal shelter took in $62,979 in “donations, gifts, and bequests” for the year. That would appear to be in a dedicated account for the shelter and I suspect this does not make its way to the General Fund at any time. I would note that if the General Fund does get more than this puny $28 amount from adoptions and other charges, and if fees increase the amount of the General Fund, officials could always ask Muncie City Council to appropriate more for the shelter. Or anything else.
* * * * *
Just to doublecheck, I looked at the 2017 report: the account titles were again confusing, but the amounts quite different: again $150,000 from the county to the city (I don’t think the amount has changed since the original agreement in 2012, which runs, by the way, through 2062. Yes, you read that right. Longer than many Muncie folks will live.)
* * * * *
The 2017 General Fund revenues for “animal shelter” was $11,834. The account didn’t say “reclaims” or anything more. Shelter donations from outside sources were $45,800. Clearly the animal shelter led all city departments in private contributions. The non-reverting animal control fund receipts were $7,298, twice the subsequent year’s. The separate “animal adoption fees” account showed $18,847 taken in, again twice the subsequent year’s amount. This would mirror the 70-30 split for shelter vs. General Fund.
* * * * *
Free to add clarity or confusion. (!)

MSD Board, statutes and what is truth?

Posted on Updated on

MSD Meeting


  • June 2012 Board of Public Works hires city engineer
  • July 2012 Mayor Tyler demands MSD board member resign
  • July 2012 City attorney informs MSD board they are violating a statute
  • January 2020 Mayor Ridenour appoints city engineer
  • January 2020 Mayor Ridenour demands an MSD board member resign
  • January 2020 MSD attorney reports there is no city engineer on the MSD board
  • January 2020 MSD attorney will review the statute.

MSD 5-minute meeting with the president, Bill Smith voicing his opinion about the letter, Mayor Ridenour presented to the Sanitation Board.  He called it unprofessional and mused why Ridenour would quit a well-paying job to be mayor.  (Rolling eyes)

In the July 18th, 2012 Star Press edition an article appeared “Tyler moves to flush Sanitary board member” The article goes on to say Tyler demanded board member Theresa Ford resign no later than Monday.  John Quirk, city attorney, cited a statute that required the city engineer to sit on the board.    In June 2012 the Board of Public Works (BOW) hired Mike Cline of Indianapolis consulting firm HWC to fill the role of an engineer.  John Quirk was a member of the BOW.

That was then and this is now.

The meeting starts with Bill Smith receiving a letter “demanding” one of the board members resign.  Mr. Smith is somewhat displeased and he hands the meeting to the MSD attorney Mark McKinney.    Mr. McKinney says the letter reads “the commissioner (name unknown) needs to resign because of the city hiring an engineer who will replace the unknown commissioner”.

Approximately 50 seconds into the video, Attorney Mark McKinney says Cline is not on the board as an engineer.  He was appointed by Mayor Dennis Tyler to sit on the board.  McKinney said he would look into the statute.  The same statute John Quirk used to remove Ford.

There seems to be a conflict.  In June 2012 Cline was hired as the city engineer.  In July 2012 John Quirk said the board was in violation of the statute requiring the city engineer to sit on the MSD board.   Quirk demanded Ford resign.  To our knowledge, Cline has been on the board ever since.  We believed he was the city engineer during Tyler’s administration.  Guess we were wrong.

McKinney said he would look into the statute.  We don’t know when Cline stopped being a city engineer but certainly, the MSD is in violation of the 2012 statute as was the previous board.

Screen Shot 2020-01-20 at 1.13.41 PM

Copied this statute from the City’s Facebook page.  It was posted as a comment:

City Engineer must be a member of the Board as required under 36-9-25-3 (b)(3) because the district was established under 36-9-25-1(b)

.IC 36-9-25-1 Application of chapter Sec. 1. (a) This chapter applies to the following: (1) A second class city located in a county having a population of more than one hundred eleven thousand (111,000) but less than one hundred fifteen thousand (115,000). (2) Each municipality in a county having a population of more than four hundred thousand (400,000) but less than seven hundred thousand (700,000) in which the legislative body has adopted this chapter by ordinance. (b) This chapter also applies to each second class city not in such a county in which the legislative body has adopted this chapter by ordinance. (c) In addition, in a consolidated city, sections 9 through 38 of this chapter apply to the department of public works and the board of public works, subject to IC 36-3-4-23. [Pre-Local Government Recodification Citations: subsection (a) formerly 19-2-27-1 part; 19-2-27-3; subsection (b) formerly 19-2-14-32part; 19-2-28-1 part; 19-2-28-6; 19-2-28.5-1; 19-2-28.5-3 part; subsection (c) formerly 18-4-2-9(a) part.] As added by Acts 1981, P.L.309, SEC.98. Amended by P.L.12-1992, SEC.179; P.L.80-1997,




Muncie EDIT Expenditures 2019

Posted on Updated on

This spreadsheet came from a Facebook post.  It looks legitimate.  (Muncie Area Community Engagement page).  We edited the spreadsheet to create a viewable list.  Some people don’t like to download documents because of security issues.  Understandable.  Due to the spreadsheet’s size, we deleted some of the columns and created the PDF.  No data has been changed only redundant columns have been deleted.  This is why we have the original spreadsheet to compare.

edit-2019-expenses1 (PDF)

EDIT 2019 Expenses (Complete spreadsheet)

Larry Riley – January 12, 2020

Posted on Updated on

Six months before The Star Press discontinued my services as a twice-weekly columnist in 2016, I became concerned that the newspaper was growing more enchanted with the Dennis Tyler city administration in Muncie. The mayor himself had long complained to me personally that I was too critical of him. I had to remind him that when I thought he had done something good, I was quick to acknowledge and congratulate.
* * * * *
One such issue was the downtown hotel, the new Marriott Courtyard. While I disagreed with underwriting the financing of the hotel by the city and committing the Food & Beverage Tax for 20 years to the parking garage, I still wrote that Tyler single-handedly deserved credit for bring the hospitality giant downtown. I even told the mayor I got flak from readers who said I shouldn’t be applauding the mayor, but I told them they were wrong.
* * * * *
Yet the mayor kept complaining, not just to me, but to the top editor at The Star Press, repeatedly, and once asked the editor to come to the mayor’s office so Tyler could air his grievances. Around that time, one of my columns got spiked—newspaper parlance for getting pulled from publication. The column was an important one about the difference between municipal “bids” versus “quotes” for a public project.
* * * * *
The difference is that bids on a project are open to any vendor who wants to compete for the work, while quotes are only from “selected” businesses—including firms that don’t even do the type of work the project calls for. That’s one of the problems that brought the city into the FBI’s sights and a major transgression I first brought to light.
* * * * *
Tyler’s Building Commissioner, Craig Nichols, son of the retired firefighter mayor’s good friend and fellow MFD retiree and fellow former Democratic Party chairman locally, had submitted bills from his private business for demolishing houses on properties where, for starters, no houses had stood. But he got the contract because the only other business quoting the work didn’t even do demolitions and had quotes higher than Nichols, hence Nichols won. Quotes were rigged.
* * * * *
But the newspaper’s top editor killed my column because I had quoted a city employee, Gretchen Cheeseman. The editor had evidently become convinced Cheeseman was the bad guy in an ongoing battle—playing out in public—in Muncie’s Community Development office. The editor didn’t want me to use Cheeseman as a source. I said I could rewrite the piece without quoting Cheeseman, and later did. Cheeseman, whom the administration wanted out of the way, got dismissed on trumped-up accusations.
* * * * *
Spiking my column did make me think The Star Press’s was leaning more and farther into the administration, buying into the mayor’s complaints. Four months later, the newspaper jettisoned me. Yet the FBI’s investigation into city wrongdoing intensified, since resulting in indictments of two high-level Muncie Sanitary District officials and three contractors, all on charges of fraud and kickbacks. And a conviction of that crooked Building Commissioner. And, of course, the indictment of former Mayor Tyler himself, on charges of accepting a bribe to steer business to a contractor.
* * * * *
And Gretchen Cheeseman was as honest as anybody in the city’s employ. In fact, she was the only obstacle between Community Development’s $4 million federal house demolitions grant and the shell corporation of Tyler’s cronies aiming to siphon that largess into their pockets. The principal crony will spend most of this year in prison. Cheeseman, meanwhile, is new Mayor Dan Ridenour’s Community Development director, replacing the woman who wrongly fired her. Delicious irony.
* * * * *
One new piece of evidence arose last week that continues my theory about the newspaper as chief apologist for the Tyler administration: the lead for the front-page story about the Muncie City Council’s refusal to appropriate money for fire department equipment purchased by Tyler last year without legal authority. A reporter wrote that Council members “refused to sign off on what they considered a mistake by the old administration.”
* * * * *
“Mistake”? What? No, this was no mistake, this was a crime, and that’s what Council members thought. If you rob a bank, you won’t be arrested for “making a mistake.” Spending city money without authorization was no mistake. The Tyler administration purchased $1.5 million in equipment without approval. To their credit, the new City Council refused to abet the crime

Day 12 – We’re still kickin’

Posted on


Screen Shot 2020-01-11 at 8.52.46 PM.png
Photo by Ricardo Esquivel

The City of Muncie is on the 12th day of rebuilding a new administration.  Most of the high profile positions have been filled.  The first city council meeting with nearly a complete turnover and a Republican majority came off better than expected.  The meeting was like watching history in the making.  The department heads were introduced.  Mayor Dan Ridenour was on hand to answer any questions or provide information.  Old habits die hard as former city council at-large, Linda Gregory, was quick to provide the parliamentary procedure as needed.

We had the opportunity to review the Board of Public Works (BOW) meeting and recommend any interested party to watch it on the City’s Fb page.  Despite the newness of the board and lack of information, Linda Gregory, Jerry Wise and Ted Baker handled the business at hand professionally.  Next meeting the board will be more prepared as well as the city controller.  Everyone is working with limited information. (More on that later.)

Linda Gregory voted in as President. Jerry Wise, Vice President, and Secretary isTed Baker.

How does one define a living organism?  Does it move?  Grow? Change?  All of these things and more.  This is how we envision the local government to be.  To move, to grow, to change, to be fluid.

Don’t be deceived, the past administration may have appeared to be moving, growing and changing but ultimately, it was only holding on to the past ways.  We seemed shocked at the depth of corruption.  To be sure, it is amazing.  By far the City of  Muncie under the direction of Dennis Tyler and a council filled with party operatives approved everything either by vote or by silence.  It has been a revolving door of FBI personnel,  economic development, gifts, and grafting reaching even into the private sector.    It was bold and in your face corruption.

Muncie Proper surpasses the Delaware County Highway Department, Justice Center, Royerton Sewer and all the other minor issues that have cropped up over the decades.

Let’s take a look at some of the issues we are or will be facing.

First is the Muncie Sanitation District.  For nearly 8 years the administration has taken a “hands-off” approach.  Now among other things we’re facing the cost of $17 million dollars for a new building.  A record increase in our monthly sanitation bills.  You ready for that, ratepayers?  The three-person board makes decisions with absolutely no oversite.  The president is still expecting the District Administrator to return to her job after the FBI arrested her.  US Attorney Josh Minkler says Grigsby used her authority to approve contractors to steer work to Franklin’s company, in exchange for kickbacks.  And we have paid for “working lunches” as if kickbacks weren’t enough…sheesh.  Madhouse.  So adding three paid board members may seem to be government overreach, but in this instance, it seems warranted.

Then there is the Muncie Redevelopment Commission and you talk about millions of dollars in debt.  The MRC was out of control.  And Human Resources and Street Department and Parks and, and…..

So while some moan and groan over Ridenour’s picks or obsess over who gets the office with the window or the new coffeemaker or the newest iPad …have at it if these are the most important issues.  Know this, change has come to Muncie, Indiana and change will continue, like it or not.




Considering every department head, the city council and the board appointments are fairly new and considering the ongoing FBI investigation,  there may be changes and where we are at financially, projects administration’s records, Mayor Dan Ridenour has put together a solid team.


214 – Let them eat cake

Posted on

Screen Shot 2019-12-03 at 6.38.27 PM

Here in Delaware County, we have a nickname for a branch of Democrats.  It’s called 214. What is 214?  Where is it?  What does it mean?

To begin we need to go back decades when Muncie was a small and thriving metropolis labeled as Middletown.  A typical American city with not so typical politics.  Smack dab in the middle of government buildings, attorney offices, and an infamous jail sits the headquarters of the local Democrat party.  214 N. Walnut.

It seems there was always some type a bruhaha around election time and every day is election time down at 214 N. Walnut.  Even when it isn’t an election year.

Take for example the 2003 mayoral race.  The former Democrat chair of the party stepped down to run for mayor.  Although all candidates were promised a level playing field one candidate complained because his campaign signs continued to fall off the windows of 214 N.Walnut.    Most likely due to generic scotch tape. The candidate, his mother and his campaign manager went to headquarters and gathered up his campaign paraphernalia.  He ran independently from headquarters and won, but the ex-Dem chair lost in the general election by less than 500 votes.

Never a dull moment.

2008 is the year it began to heat-up.  Judicial candidates were asked to donate to party headquarters.  They refused to “pay to play” and were shunned.    Party rules were updated, candidates distanced themselves from headquarters, poll books found in the trash.  The newspaper reported threatening telephone calls, cold shoulders, nasty letters and destruction of property.  It looked as if Democrat Headquarters was going to implode.

One lone citizen penned an essay “Fahrenheit 214” and published it on the political forum of the newspaper.  It created quite a firestorm, pardon the pun.  Out of this came the name “214” and it encompassed any Democrat who aligned themselves with party leadership.

214 is far more than the address of the Democrat Headquarters, it’s a mindset.  In other words, you don’t need to be sitting in the backroom of headquarters to have the mind and heart of a 214er.  Some Democrats will vehemently say “I am a Democrat, but I’m not a 214 Democrat.”  They think of it only as a place.  Never once considering their actions and thoughts fit the very definition of 214.

We’ve had decades of corruption, infighting, election issues, malfeasance.  Today in Middletown, USA it makes all the past decades look like a walk in the park.  As they raked in the dough on the backs of the people, you can almost hear “Let them eat cake.”

The Hampton Distraction-Saturday Ramblings

Posted on



As of this writing, we have 52 days until the swearing-in of Muncie’s new mayor, Dan Ridenour.  Dan’s win will usher in a complete change for the Muncie City administration.  Yet, the big news is should Hampton be removed?  Of course, he should step down of his own volition.  Or the council should exercise their legal obligation and remove him.  Doubt either will happen.

Why do we think Hampton is a non-starter?  First, and foremost we still have Mayor Dennis Tyler in office.  He’s not leaving the city in the best of shape.  Sadly, he will do as much damage as possible.  His true colors are showing for all to see.  If he loved the city as much as he claimed, his desire would be for the city’s well-being.  We have nine city council members who could vote anything in or out.  Seven of those members won’t be returning in 2020.  Jerry Disman and Brad Polk will be the veteran members.

Hampton is a minor distraction amongst the major issues facing this city.

Some of the items on the agenda is an independent audit of the city.  Additionally, we have accounts running in the red and millions of dollars in debt.   Time doesn’t permit all of the issues facing our city to be listed.

Not to mention getting major positions filled as well as the support staff for each department.  Below is a list we compiled – not necessarily in order of importance.

  1. Muncie Parks Superintendent
  2. Fire Chief
  3. Police Chief
  4. Community Development Director
  5. Superintendent Board of Public Works
  6. City Controller
  7. Prairie Creek Superintendent
  8. Building commissioner
  9. Human Resource Director
  10. Redevelopment Director
  11. Law firm 
  12. Animal Shelter Director
  13. Board of Public Works
  14. Channel 60 Director
  15. Various board appointments
  16. Support staff

Despite the fact, the Democrat Headquarters broke Indianan State law by appointing Hampton in the first place, this is just 214 DHQ doing what they have always done.   So, let’s get him out of that position.  And for sure, let’s watch how the council votes and the actions of the outgoing mayor.

You see after Hampton is gone he will soon be forgotten.  Sticking with us for some time is the effects and cost of corruption.  John should gracefully and with dignity remove himself.  So should Tyler exhibit the same when he leaves office,  However, whether it be winning or defeat, grace and dignity have never been their strengths.

Screen Shot 2019-11-09 at 11.29.01 AM



Screen Shot 2019-11-09 at 11.22.16 AM

Muncie Financials as of 10-23-19

Posted on

letting cat out of the bag lincol 1860
Political ad (1860)

Muncie Debt 10-23-19

And if you want to see more, simply visit Indiana Gateway info online.

We would like to make this small observation about the 2019 election.  Comparatively speaking, this has been a mild campaign season.  Yea, a few “bad rumors”, a few little lies nothing like we have seen in the 2010 or 2011 campaigns.  I wonder if it would be acceptable to contact candidates who lost and sing “Ding, dong the witch is dead”.  Sure, it’s all fun and games until it happens to you.

That’s all for today.  Happy Hunting!


Conflicts of interest. For non-facebook people

Posted on

Screen Shot 2019-09-30 at 7.29.46 PM

Larry Riley

I think this is the final leftover souvenir I saved from my last year at The Star Press. Or parts thereof. The contract itself is eight pages long, so I’ve cut and pieced together the more interesting components, some of which I’ve highlighted. This is the only known to me contract between the City of Muncie and shell company Capitol Consulting & Property Management.
* * * * *
The contract would seem to be standard boilerplate. You see the date of the agreement and the parties at the top. Seven houses were to be demolished, all east of old Indiana Steel and Wire, now becoming Kitselman Pure Energy Park, a private development (so why is government involved?) to be a “live-work-play” project, which mostly would also appear to be another phantom operation. The “work” part includes, ostensibly, assembling mobile electric generators.
* * * * *
I will say that the $74,950 price-tag for seven structures is only double the usual cost of demolishing a house, not quadruple the cost, which is what the city Building Commissioner’s other private business charged the city earlier that year to take down four houses using rigged quotes. I’m not sure this contract ever went out for bid. To recap, after the FBI got the Building Commissioner indicted, later convicted, on those four house demolitions, which never existed in the first place, agents started talking to the woman who had incorporated Capitol Consulting. She ran a tax preparation business on Muncie’s south side.
* * * * *
She admitted in a transcribed interview with federal agents that she agreed in 2015 to incorporate and sign off as representative for Capitol Consulting to hide company ownership by the Building Commissioner, who told her he was getting too much heat in the newspaper over his other firm, Advanced Walls & Ceilings, which raked in a small fortune in city money—including for the phantom demolitions. He wanted more privacy, she said. She said she “did not think he would do anything illegal, in part because of his position as a public official.” I don’t know how FBI agents or even she, kept a straight face when she said that.
* * * * *
So the city was dealing with a firm allegedly operated by a tax preparer who incorporated the business using her home’s residential address, who owned no heavy equipment, had no physical office location (mail went to a PO box), no employees, wasn’t licensed to do asbestos inspections nor employed anyone who did. And nobody realized it? Because they looked the other way.
* * * * *
In the image below, I underlined places that specify the role of the Building Commissioner. Then the entirety of the “conflict of interest” section, where the parties explicitly specify that they would not do exactly what the company did. I also underlined the sentence about the company doing at least 51 percent of the work and not subcontracting the work out—which again is exactly opposite what the firm did.
* * * * *
At the bottom you can see the signatures. Signing for the city was John Quirk, an attorney and Delaware County public defender who should know something about crime.
* * * * *
Here’s what’s worth keeping in mind now, connecting the recent past to the present: the fingerprints of Community Development Director Terry Whitt Bailey are all over this contract, literally and figuratively. Literally, because I got this contract from her. I got told she had the only copy of any contract between Capitol Consulting and the city. Her office handled demolitions for the city. I asked her for a copy of this public record and she provided it.
* * * * *
The figurative fingerprints come from her place right in the midst of what the city was preparing to do with $4 million in federal funds given to Muncie to demolish houses. The Building Commissioner set up Capitol Consulting before the city completed preparations for spending the $4 million. Bailey then fired the key Community Development employee most involved with demolitions, removing a woman who would not have looked the other way if Capitol Consulting got hundreds of demolitions contracts. In 2015, Capitol got $144,800 from city and MSD for demolition work. In 2016, the firm got $150,325 from them, including $40,000 in two checks directly from Community Development accounts. One has to conclude Bailey herself approved the payments.
* * * * *
The mayor of Muncie, a Democrat, has said nothing to the citizens of his city about the theft by his Building Commissioner, who’s currently in federal prison. Nor has he said anything about the FBI’s investigation into rigged bids and kickbacks at his Muncie Sanitary District, in which two high-ranking public officials and three contractors have been indicted. But Mayor Dennis Tyler made a decision not to run for re-election. Instead, Bailey now runs on Democratic Headquarters ticket to become mayor of Muncie. In six weeks, voters decide if she will.

%d bloggers like this: